23 March 2026, New Delhi.
The Privileges Committee of the Delhi Legislative Assembly has presented the Second Report of the Eighth Assembly in the form of an interim report. The report was tabled in the House on 23 March 2026 and focuses on examining the authenticity of the “execution chamber” installed within the Assembly premises in 2022. The report has been prepared after detailed deliberations, meetings, and analysis of available facts and documents. Its objective is to establish the factual position of the matter and ensure that all procedures related to the installation were carried out in accordance with prescribed rules and regulations.
Committee Composition and Membership Details
For the year 2025-2026, the Privileges Committee was constituted under the chairmanship of Pradyumn Singh Rajput. The committee includes members Abhay Kumar Verma, Ajay Mahawar, Neeraj Basoya, Ram Singh Netaji, Ravikant, Satish Upadhyay, Surendra Kumar, and Suryaprakash Khatri.
All members actively participated in the committee’s proceedings and contributed to discussions on various aspects of the issue. The composition of the committee ensured a balanced and fair approach, allowing different perspectives to be considered during the investigation. This diversity enabled a more comprehensive evaluation of the matter and strengthened the overall review process.
Meetings and Adoption of the Report
The committee held meetings on 16 February 2026 and 06 March 2026 to deliberate on the issue. During these meetings, members examined documents, reviewed evidence, and discussed all relevant aspects in detail.
The interim report was formally adopted during the meeting held on 19 March 2026. The committee’s earlier report had been presented on 06 January 2026 and was accepted by the House on 09 January 2026. The current report represents a continuation of the investigation and builds upon the findings of the previous report.
Background and Basis of Investigation
The matter was referred to the committee on 07 August 2025 for investigation. It relates to the existence of an “execution chamber” within the Assembly premises and its inauguration on 09 August 2022.
The committee was tasked with verifying the authenticity of the installation and determining whether all related procedures were followed as per established norms. To fulfill this responsibility, the committee collected relevant information from various sources and analyzed the available data. The report reflects these efforts and provides a structured overview of the investigation.
Support from the Assembly Secretariat
The committee acknowledged the support provided by the Assembly Secretariat during its sittings and in the preparation of the report. The Secretariat assisted in organizing meetings, compiling documents, and providing administrative support.
Officials involved in this process include Ranjit Singh, Sadanand Sah, Ravinder Kumar, and Raghunath. Their contributions ensured that the committee’s work progressed smoothly and efficiently. The administrative coordination provided by the Secretariat played a key role in maintaining the structure and timeline of the investigation process.
Authorization for Presentation of Report
The committee authorized the Chairperson to present the report before the House. In case of absence, Abhay Kumar Verma has been authorized to present the report on behalf of the committee.
This arrangement ensures procedural continuity and guarantees that the report is presented without delay. It reflects the structured approach followed by the committee in managing its responsibilities.
Significance and Way Forward
The interim report marks an important stage in the ongoing investigation. It provides a foundation for further examination and helps guide future proceedings related to the matter.
The committee has emphasized that the investigation will continue with transparency and objectivity until all aspects of the issue are thoroughly examined. The findings and observations presented in this report are expected to assist in reaching a well-informed and balanced conclusion.
This report highlights the role of institutional mechanisms in addressing sensitive matters and reinforces the importance of accountability and procedural integrity within the legislative framework.
