Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s first public remarks on the recently passed Waqf Amendment Act, 2025, have ignited a fierce political debate. While the BJP sees it as a firm stance against appeasement politics, several Opposition parties have slammed the law as divisive, claiming it further deepens religious and community-based fault lines. The legislation, intended to overhaul the management of Waqf properties, has brought the issue of minority rights and government reforms back into national spotlight.
BJP calls it a stand for justice and inclusivity
Speaking at the News18 Rising Bharat Summit, PM Narendra Modi accused the Opposition of promoting appeasement under the guise of minority rights. He said the new law ensures justice for Pasmanda Muslims, women, and children who have long been denied their rightful share in Waqf benefits. Terming the Opposition’s resistance as “appeasement politics,” he emphasized the government’s commitment to inclusive governance.
Echoing Narendra Modi’s stance, BJP spokesperson Shehzad Poonawala described the Prime Minister’s remarks as a “strong response to the provocative lobby.” He said the law aims to introduce transparency in the management of Waqf properties and uphold the rights of underrepresented groups within the Muslim community.
Opposition accuses BJP of divisiveness
Opposition leaders, however, strongly criticized Narendra Modi’s comments. Congress MLC Addanki Dayakar said the Act divides not only Hindus and Muslims but also fragments the Muslim community itself. He alleged that the BJP government continually uses religion to polarize society.
The Samajwadi Party took a harsher tone, warning against the marginalization of India’s Muslim population. SP spokesperson Ameeq Jamei accused the BJP of trying to take over community spaces and institutions using what he termed “black laws.”
AIADMK leader Kovai Sathyan said that any reform must be inclusive and built on consultation. He questioned why the government did not engage stakeholders from the Muslim community before enacting the law, calling it a unilateral move that alienates minorities.
